First and foremost, Romania has no active volcanos on its territory. But in spite of this, according to the following article, ignoring volcanic hazards would be inadvisable.
"The relevance of volcanic hazard in Romania: is there any?" by Alexandru Szakács and Seghedi, Ioan published in the Environmental Engineering and Management Journal in January 2013, http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/86231090/relevance-volcanic-hazard-romania-there-any, states volcanic hazard is ignored in natural hazard studies in Romania precisely because
no active volcano is known on its territory. However, it also states that the 2010 eruption
of the Eyjafjallajökull volcano in Iceland and its consequences on air
traffic safety across Europe and the whole northern hemisphere
dramatically demonstrated that volcanic hazard in a certain area, such
as a country, is not necessarily related to the presence of active
volcanoes in the same territory. Therefore, target-focused approaches to
volcanic hazard should also consider remotely located hazard sources
with respect the target territory.
Thus, the above mentioned article attempts at making an
inventory of potential volcanic hazard sources for the territory of
Romania, irrespective of their location inside or outside the country. According to the article, external volcanic sources implying ash-fall hazard from tephra
dispersion following explosive volcanic eruptions include the Central
Italian field of active volcanoes (e.g. Campii Flegreii and Vesuvius),
the active Aegean volcanic arc, the Eifel region of Central Europe
(Germany), and Iceland. And geologic evidence of thick tephra deposition
from Campi Flegreii found in southern Romania clearly indicates that such type of
volcanic hazard is real.
On the other hand, study of the most recent
volcanic activity in Romania shows that the last eruptive event occurred at Ciomadul volcano at the
south-eastern end of the Calimani-Gurghiu-Harghita volcanic range
(East Carpathians) in a poorly-constrained time interval of 10.7 to 35 Ka in the continuation of a ca. 10.5 Ma.
A number of peculiar features of the
Ciomadul volcano and its surroundings strongly suggest that the magma
plumbing system of this volcano is not definitely frozen: a well-focused
and strongest-in-Romania heat-flow anomaly, crustal and sub-crustal
local seismic activity, seismic wave attenuation patterns recorded in
seismic tomography images, most intense "post-volcanic activity"
including mantle-originated gas emanations. All these symptoms allow one
to consider that future eruptions from this volcano cannot be ruled
out. The article concludes that more geophysical studies are needed to obtain more basic
information on the current status of the magma-generating and plumbing
systems of Ciomadul volcano, which is crucial from the viewpoint of
volcanic hazard assessment.
Since Romania has no relatively recent volcanic activity and as mentioned, to date, it has no active volcanos on its territory, very little, if nothing is done to warn people about volcanic eruptions.
However, what is interesting in Romania is the presence of the so-called "muddy volcanos"located in the Buzau county, near the village of Berca. Not as spectacular as real volcanos, but still an interesting phenomena. These so-called volcanoes are active all the time, which means gas is
pushing mud to the surface in a continuous way, but at low speeds.
Great information about the 'indirect' volcanic hazards in your country and the mud volcanoes! (very frequent in a lot of Europe and everywhere offshore!) what type of volcano is the Ciomadul volcano?
ReplyDeleteThe Ciomadul Volcano, based on tectonic settings and origins, is a volcano that came about as a result of the supposed subduction along the fore land of the Carpathian chain, of the lateral movement and rotations of microplates, a thinning of the continental crust and the litosphere and consequential formation of deep basins. The last volcanic eruption at the Ciomadul Volcano resulted in a deep explosion crater which made room for the Saint Anna Lake. From what I read, it is difficult to claim that this volcano is extinct even after an incredibly long time and the potential for volcanic activity may still be there, even though it may latent (dormant).
ReplyDeleteV. nice entry! I was curious on the type itself. From what I gathered, it is a dacitic (rock type between andesite and rhyolite) dome complex one, so pretty dangerous at that time!
ReplyDelete